According to the Hudson Group, international travel has increased from 2014 to 2015 with now 67% of travelers taking an international leisure trip. 49% of travelers will spend more to travel to a dream destination (see graphic below). This increase in travel is being reflected at Houston Intercontinental Airport (IAH), which has seen an upswing in terms of the number of international carriers that have started service from the airport. In the last 5 years, two of the three Gulf Airlines – Emirates and Qatar – have started service from IAH while Air New Zealand recently announced direct service from Houston to Auckland. Asian carriers have also been adding or increasing their service from Houston, including both EVA Airways from Taiwan and ANA from Japan. On June 12, 2015 ANA launched their service from Houston Intercontinental to Tokyo Narita and became the first connection between Japan and Texas (later on, Japan Airlines announced service between Dallas and Tokyo Narita). As a Star Alliance partner, ANA’s connection to Houston seems obvious with IAH being the hub for Star Alliance partner United. Through this connection, ANA can connect to South America and beyond through their partnership and alliance with United (see attached graphic from ANA). The inbound flight departs Tokyo at 11:15am and arrives Houston at 9:30am, while the outbound flight departs Houston at 11:20am and arrives Tokyo at 3:20pm (the next day). The flight time is very convenient to make connections on both sides. The flight time on the inbound is about 11.5 hours while the outbound is 13 hours (favorable tailwinds on the inbound decrease the flight time).
24-hours prior to our departure, I was able to check-in online and confirm my seat assignment. I received my second boarding pass but needed to go to the counter to receive my first boarding pass. I arrived at IAH airport at 9:30am for the 11:15am flight and there was no one in line at the counter so getting my boarding pass and checking in bags was very quick. ANA allows 2 checked-in bags of 23 kg each as well as a hand carry. We received our boarding pass, went through security and proceeded to our gate. Our gate was in the D terminal and there is not a lot to do in terms of eating, drinking, or shopping. Luckily D terminal is connected to C and E terminals and they have more options available. Boarding time and departure time were pushed back due to late arrival of aircraft – another thing that surprised me given the reputation of the airline for punctuality. Boarding commenced and we boarded the plane. After about an hour into flight, the in-flight service started with drinks and snacks. The snack was rice crackers, and these were available throughout the flight. After drinks, the meal service started. If you had ordered a special meal, those were delivered first. In terms of the regular meal, ANA provides two options: a Japanese option or a Western option. The meal descriptions are available on the PTV from the beginning of the flight and the flight attendants pass around picture menu of the options to provide you with more information. I had ordered a special meal, and this meal was confirmed at check-in, once boarded, and again when the meal was presented. Overall, the food was average. It wasn’t the best tasting or plentiful airline food I have tasted, but I have tasted worse so overall the food had decent flavors and a decent portion size. After the lunch service concluded, the window shades were lowered so people could relax and rest. If passengers got hungry or thirsty, there were light snacks and drinks available in the galleys. The light snacks included mini chocolates, bananas, and rice crackers. In the middle of the flight, a light snack was given (a sandwich) and then prior to landing breakfast was served.


We landed in Tokyo, and after a 3-hour layover, boarded our next flight. Our next flight was a 7-hour flight from Tokyo-Narita to Singapore on board ANA's 787 Dreamliner. Experiencing both the 777 and the 787, I noticed some major differences between the two. One differene was the seat pitch, which was narrower on the 787. On the 777, I had plenty of legroom to stretch out and my knees never hit the seat in front of me. On the 787, there was limited room to stretch out and my knees hit the seat in front of me. While this was definitely a negative, there were some positives flying aboard the 787. The 787 was definitely a more modern plane and thus it had more modern amenities, including a tablet-like PTV. The PTV also included newer movies that were not available on the 777 - all the new movies that were available on the 787 later migrated on the 777, As both planes had mood lighting and decent service, these were the only differences I saw in flying on both planes.
For our return trip, we had a similar experience with flying the 787 from Singapore to Tokyo (this time Haneda) and then the 777 from Tokyo to Houston. Since we had to switch planes in Tokyo, I decided to take the opportunity to explore the city. ANA does not have a “See Tokyo” or “free layover” package so I just booked a multi-city ticket with a stopover in Tokyo. It costs a bit more but it was worth it to get to experience Tokyo.
Overall, flying aboard ANA was a nice and pleasant experience. The airline provided a good service and good plane, with plenty of legroom, nice service, and decent food. Would I fly ANA again? I think the mark of a great airline is when you have options; you go out of your way to fly them again whereas a good airline is one that is not your first choice but a good choice. In my opinion, ANA is a good airline; it is an airline that provides a good service in a nice plane but I would not go out of my way to fly the airline. In comparing ANA to some of its regional and global competitors, I believe it holds its own but still has room for growth.
![]() |
| created by leading travel retailer Hudson Group (Hudson News, Hudson Booksellers, Hudson stores) |
![]() |
| ANA Business Class Amenity Kit |



Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar